Simulation Study on Digital Divide Propagation Path of Elderly Medical Treatment Based on Graph Neural Network and Public Social Network Data

Authors

  • Linna Yang School of Economics and Management, Lanzhou Institute of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67541/jdc2609

Keywords:

Digital divided in medical treatment for the elderly; Graph neural network; Propagation path simulation; Heterogeneous social networks; Optimization of intervention strategy

Abstract

To address the self-reinforcing diffusion of the digital divide in elderly medical treatment and the difficulty of precise intervention, this study proposes a Propagation–Adoption Coupled Graph Neural Network (PAC-GNN) and a path-level interpretable simulation framework. Using three types of public social network data, a heterogeneous multi-layer network with four node types and four edge layers was constructed, retaining 191607 users and 6057580 interaction records, with elderly users accounting for 19.3%; the elderly identification classifier achieved an AUC of 0.91. PAC-GNN integrates dual-channel decoupling, random-walk path encoding, cross-layer attention, and a causal masking mechanism to enable fine-grained modeling of propagation paths. Experimental results show that compared with the suboptimal baseline EvolveGCN, PAC-GNN reduces state prediction RMSE by 14.2%, improves path prediction F1 by 18.3%, and lowers literacy-dimension error by 19.5%; under 20% node perturbation, its performance decay is 8.3 percentage points lower than that of baselines. Simulation identifies five typical propagation patterns, among which intra-community diffusion accounts for 28.4% with an elderly participation rate of 68.7%, while cross-community bridging paths contribute nearly 60% of global state change. Multi-objective optimization indicates that the community-bridging strategy achieves the best overall balance among effectiveness, cost, and benefit equity.

References

[1] Erku, D., Khatri, R., Endalamaw, A., Wolka, E., Nigatu, F., Zewdie, A., & Assefa, Y. (2023). Digital health interventions to improve access to and quality of primary health care services: a scoping review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 20(19), 6854. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20196854

[2] Paul, S., Riffat, M., Yasir, A., Mahim, M. N., Sharnali, B. Y., Naheen, I. T., ... & Kulkarni, A. (2021). Industry 4.0 applications for medical/healthcare services. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 10(3), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan10030043

[3] Hermes, S., Riasanow, T., Clemons, E. K., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020). The digital transformation of the healthcare industry: exploring the rise of emerging platform ecosystems and their influence on the role of patients. Business Research, 13(3), 1033-1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-020-00125-x

[4] Li, H., Li, Q., Yang, Z., & Shangguan, X. (2026). Digital technology-enabled public services and rural residents’ subjective wellbeing: synergies and pathways in China. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 10, 1718922. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2026.1718922

[5] Zhao, Y., Zhang, T., Dasgupta, R. K., & Xia, R. (2023). Narrowing the age‐based digital divide: Developing digital capability through social activities. Information Systems Journal, 33(2), 268-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12400

[6] Cui, Y., Bao, H., Wen, K., & Wen, H. (2025). Bridging the digital health divide: digital endowment, informal social participation, and health inequality among older adults. BMC Health Services Research, 26(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13872-6

[7] Faye, R., & Ravneberg, B. E. (2024, May). Making vulnerable groups able to connect socially and digitally—Opportunities and pitfalls. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 9, p. 1346721). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1346721

[8] Coles-Kemp, L., Robinson, N., & Heath, C. P. (2022). Protecting the vulnerable: Dimensions of assisted digital access. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW2), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555647

[9] Martin, F., Ceviker, E., & Gezer, T. (2026). From digital divide to digital equity: Systematic review of two decades of research on educational digital divide factors, dimensions, and interventions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 58(2), 396-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2024.2425442

[10] Aruleba, K., & Jere, N. (2022). Exploring digital transforming challenges in rural areas of South Africa through a systematic review of empirical studies. Scientific African, 16, e01190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01190

[11] Zhou, L., Lin, J., Li, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Innovation diffusion of mobile applications in social networks: A multi-agent system. Sustainability, 12(7), 2884. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072884

[12] Zareer, M., & Selmic, R. R. (2025). A survey on opinion dynamics in social media networks: Analysis, simulation, and control. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2025.3622498

[13] Fan, R., Yang, L., Liu, D., & Hu, W. (2026). Value allocation mechanism for multi-agent data sharing in digital innovation network: Agent-based modeling. Expert Systems with Applications, 299, 130124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.130124

[14] Tai, Y., He, H., Zhang, W., Yang, H., Wu, X., & Wang, Y. (2023). Predicting information diffusion using the inter-and intra-path of influence transitivity. Information Sciences, 651, 119705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.119705

[15] Zheng, Y., Yi, L., & Wei, Z. (2025). A survey of dynamic graph neural networks. Frontiers of Computer Science, 19(6), 196323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-024-3853-2

[16] Feng, Z., Wang, R., Wang, T., Song, M., Wu, S., & He, S. (2025). A comprehensive survey of dynamic graph neural networks: Models, frameworks, benchmarks, experiments and challenges. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2025.3621291

[17] Gondal, N. (2023). Diffusion of innovations through social networks: Determinants and implications. Sociology Compass, 17(5), e13084. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13084

[18] Xiang, S., Ling, H., & Wu, M. (2026). Cross-Modal Alignment and Rectified Flow-Based Latent Representation Synthesis for Enhanced Speech-Driven Alzheimer’s Disease Detection. Bioengineering, 13(3), 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13030370

[19] Zhuo, S., Fang, J., Lin, H., Li, N., Zhou, Y., Zhang, S., ... & Huang, S. (2026). EdgeGFL: rethinking edge information in graph feature preference learning. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 17(5), 240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-026-03060-1

[20] You, X., Zhang, M., Ma, Y., Tan, J., & Liu, Z. (2023). Impact of higher-order interactions and individual emotional heterogeneity on information-disease coupled dynamics in multiplex networks. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 177, 114186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114186

[21] Gong, Z., Shao, J., Rahman, N., Su, L. Y. F., & Wang, Y. C. (2026). Modality matters: comparing the persuasiveness of text-and voice-based conversational agents and non-interactive messages in health communication. Internet Research, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-07-2025-1004

[22] Cui, S., & Zhu, X. (2024). The information propagation mechanism of individual heterogeneous adoption behavior under the heterogeneous network. Frontiers in Physics, 12, 1404464. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2024.1404464

[23] Yang, Y. (2025, July). Research on Evaluation Model of Urban-rural Integration Development Based on Deep Learning. In Proceedings of the 2025 3rd International Conference on Educational Knowledge and Informatization (pp. 406-410). https://doi.org/10.1145/3765325.3765393

[24] Ao, X., Gong, Y., & He, A. (2025). A review of time series prediction models based on deep learning. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3602791

[25] Yu, Y., & Huo, L. A. (2025). Effects of official information diffusion and rumor-related behavior adoption on epidemic transmission in multiplex networks. Information Sciences, 689, 121414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2024.121414

[26] Liu, Y., Zhang, P., Shi, L., & Gong, J. (2023). A survey of information dissemination model, datasets, and insight. Mathematics, 11(17), 3707. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11173707

[27] Theodorakopoulos, L., Theodoropoulou, A., & Klavdianos, C. (2025). Interactive viral marketing through big data analytics, influencer networks, AI integration, and ethical dimensions. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 20(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20020115

[28] Yue, Z., Witzig, C. R., Jorde, D., & Jacobsen, H. A. (2020, November). Bert4nilm: A bidirectional transformer model for non-intrusive load monitoring. In Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on non-intrusive load monitoring (pp. 89-93). https://doi.org/10.1145/3427771.3429390

[29] Liao, T., Ta, X., Xu, Y., Han, L., Sun, L., & Lv, W. (2025). SimPRL: a simple contrastive learning for path representation learning by joint GPS trajectories and road paths. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 27(1), 400-413. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2025.3629800

[30] Yang, C., Xiao, Y., Zhang, Y., Sun, Y., & Han, J. (2020). Heterogeneous network representation learning: A unified framework with survey and benchmark. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 34(10), 4854-4873. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2020.3045924

Published

2026-10-01

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available upon request from the corresponding authors, L.Y.

Funding information

This research was supported by the Young Faculty Research Fund of the School of Economics and Management, Lanzhou Institute of Technology (Grant No. KYJJ202402).

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Yang, L. (2026). Simulation Study on Digital Divide Propagation Path of Elderly Medical Treatment Based on Graph Neural Network and Public Social Network Data. Journal of Discovery Core, 1(2), 38-79. https://doi.org/10.67541/jdc2609